A parliamentary committee is facing criticism over its handling of a proposed change to the Waqf Act, specifically regarding a clause called “waqf by user.” This clause has been part of the law for a long time, and now some members of the committee want to remove it. Opposition leaders, like Asaduddin Owaisi, are strongly against this removal, saying it could negatively impact communities that rely on Waqf properties. They also say that the committee’s chairman, Jagdambika Pal, has not listened to their concerns.
The “waqf by user” clause is important because it relates to how people use and benefit from Waqf properties. These properties are often donated for religious or charitable purposes. Therefore, removing this clause could create problems for people who depend on these lands and structures. Opposition members felt like the committee was not really considering their ideas. They believe the process was just a show, without genuine interest in different viewpoints. One leader, Abdul Bari Masoud, stated that the chairman acted on instructions from his political party, disregarding the opinions of the opposition.
This situation highlights a larger political conflict. The proposed changes to the Waqf Act are not being considered in a fair and unbiased way, according to some committee members. They are worried that the changes could cause harm to the community. The removal of the “waqf by user” clause has caused great concern as the bill moves further in the process. The disagreement shows a lack of open conversation in a very important part of how our government works.