Jharkhand Headmistress’ Salary Stopped Amid Signature Backdating Row

Jharkhand Headmistress Salary Stopped Amid Signatu

The District Education Officer (DEO) in Saraikela is facing scrutiny after withholding the salary of Ambika Pradhan, the headmistress in charge of NR Plus Two High School. This action comes after previous allegations of misconduct were leveled against the DEO, Santosh Gupta.

Salary Halt Sparks Controversy

The order to stop Pradhan’s salary includes a demand for clarification on seven points. The DEO has stated that failure to respond within 24 hours may lead to further departmental action. This swift deadline and the salary suspension have been viewed by some as retaliation, deepening the conflict between Pradhan and the DEO’s office.

The reasons cited for these demands involve administrative procedures and ensuring the school is following all necessary rules. However, the timing of this action, following earlier allegations against the DEO, has raised questions about the motives behind it.

Past Allegations of Misconduct

This isn’t the first time District Education Officer Santosh Gupta has been accused of overstepping. Previous claims involved pressuring the headmistress to backdate signatures in the service book. These prior allegations have already brought unwanted attention to the DEO’s office. Consider also how teacher training programs can help reduce workplace conflicts.

These earlier claims have added fuel to the current controversy. The headmistress is now facing a salary suspension while being required to provide a detailed explanation to the DEO’s office.

Implications for the Education Department

The current situation is creating worry about the overall work environment within the Saraikela education department. How this disagreement is resolved could set a precedent for how schools are run and how disagreements are handled in the future. All eyes are on Pradhan as she prepares to respond to the DEO’s demands. The central question remains: are the DEO’s actions justified, or do they represent an inappropriate use of authority?

For details about our content, please refer to our Disclaimer