Pramanik, who operated a kiosk from the shop, expressed shock and dismay at the sudden demolition. He claims he received no warning and lost valuable goods damaged during the process. This lack of communication has raised concerns among other potentially affected individuals.
Tata Steel, however, maintains the demolition was necessary to address encroachment issues in the area. While acknowledging the campaign’s importance, many urge the company to adopt a more transparent and considerate approach, including providing proper notice and potential compensation to affected individuals.