The recently unveiled Union Budget is facing heavy criticism from opposition leaders who argue it favors political gains over genuine national development. They describe the budget as a superficial fix, designed more to secure the current coalition government rather than address the country’s wider issues. Specifically, the opposition claims that certain states, particularly Bihar, are receiving a large share of funds, which they believe is a reward for political support.
According to the opposition, this budget appears to prioritize rewarding key allies instead of tackling important societal problems. They point out that after recent national elections, Nitish Kumar’s JD(U) and Chandrababu Naidu’s TDP played crucial roles in helping the BJP-led NDA form the government. Consequently, these parties and their respective states seem to be benefiting most from the budget. This approach, opponents argue, ignores the urgent needs of other states and the economy as a whole.
The significant financial allocation to Bihar is drawing considerable scrutiny. Opposition parties are suggesting that this major commitment of funds seems to be a direct return for political backing, instead of being based on actual needs. One opposition leader stated that the budget goes against the principle of social justice, reflecting the wider sentiment that the budget is not fair to all states. These criticisms highlight the concern that the budget favors the ruling coalition’s interests over the nation’s progress.
Furthermore, the political timing of the budget has raised concerns, given Bihar is due to hold state elections soon. The opposition suggests this funding boost to the state may influence the upcoming vote. They believe the budget is acting as a strategic move to ensure political power and maintain the coalition, rather than a genuine financial plan for the country. In short, the opposition views the budget as a political tool instead of a plan for national advancement.