The Delhi High Court has indicated that it will not spend unlimited time hearing arguments in the bail case of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and others accused of planning the 2020 Delhi riots. These individuals face charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, or UAPA. Judges Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur, who are overseeing the case, made it clear there would be a limit to how long they would allow arguments to continue. This case involves several people accused of serious crimes connected to the violent events in Delhi.
During the hearing, the Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) from the Delhi Police continued to argue against granting bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. However, the judges warned the SPP that the court could not allow the hearings to go on forever. This statement came after many arguments had already been presented by both sides of the case. The court noted the need to keep things moving, suggesting that no one could expect unlimited time to discuss the case. The lengthy nature of this case, which involves serious charges related to the riots, is a central issue in the legal proceedings.
The court’s remarks show the complicated legal hurdles and drawn-out procedures that come with cases involving the UAPA. The judges said to the SPP, “We can’t give you endless time,” which emphasizes their goal to manage the court’s schedule effectively. Furthermore, the outcome of this case could be very important. It could establish new legal guidelines for using the UAPA in cases related to riots. Also, it could have big legal and political effects in the future.