Congress Questions Modi’s “Cavalier” Handling of Law Commission Amidst UCC Delay

Congress Questions Modis Cavalier Handling of Law

The Congress party has raised concerns about how the Modi government is managing the Law Commission, particularly regarding the Uniform Civil Code (UCC). They noted that the 22nd Law Commission completed its term without submitting a report on the UCC. Additionally, the government has not yet announced the members for the new commission. This situation has led the Congress party to question why the government seems to be handling such a crucial organization with a lack of seriousness.

The controversy gained more attention after the Chief Minister of Uttarakhand, Pushkar Singh Dhami, stated that the state’s UCC rules would soon be finalized. The Congress party argues that the government appears to be delaying progress on the UCC, even though it’s a significant and complex legal matter. The 22nd Law Commission’s input was considered vital, and the lack of a report, along with the delay in forming the next commission, is concerning to the party. Therefore, they are questioning the government’s commitment to established legal processes.

Moreover, the Congress party has expressed concern over the lack of transparency regarding the Law Commission’s work. They also voiced their disapproval with what they see as the government’s apparent lack of focus on this important issue. According to a press release from June 14th, the Congress party asked, “Why is this respected body being treated in such a cavalier manner?” These concerns are also related to the current discussion about implementing the Uniform Civil Code.

The Uniform Civil Code is a plan to create a single set of laws that would apply to all citizens, regardless of their religion. This is a complex issue that has generated different opinions across the country. The current situation with the Law Commission, therefore, might have significant effects on the future of the UCC. As a result, this situation will likely continue to be a topic of discussion.

For details about our content, please refer to our Disclaimer