The Supreme Court in India said no to bail for Erappungal Abubacker, who used to be the head of a group called Popular Front of India, or PFI. The group was banned. Abubacker asked for bail because he said he had health problems and needed help. But the judges looked at his medical papers and decided they wouldn’t give him bail right now. They did say that if his health gets worse, he can ask the court where his trial will be for bail again.
The court’s decision about bail was all about the health info they had and not about if Abubacker was guilty or not. The judges didn’t say exactly what his health problems were. They just said they knew he had them. The court said he could still try for bail with the trial court if his health goes down hill. This leaves a chance for him to get bail later on if his health changes and they have new medical info.
The court’s decision shows they are following the rules. They didn’t give him bail right away, but they made sure he can still ask for it later. This is if his health gets bad and the trial court thinks it is ok. This case shows how the courts handle bail requests when someone says they have health issues, while keeping the legal process going.